Eight More Years of Bush OR One Nuclear Bomb Detonation?

November 18, 2008

Rant by Me: Can We Stand Another Eight Years of Yours Truly?

I posed this question about eight weeks ago, prior to the election. I  then went around the office and randomly asked people if they would prefer eight more years of George W. Bush at the helm or a nuclear bomb detonation on one of our major cities?

In most cases people asked if they could choose the city. I restricted it to Los Angeles, Chicago, or New York. Considering I am the only one in the office from the L.A. area it was no surprise to me most selected L.A. as the target city. Once I educated them on the fact our jet stream moves in an easterly direction, some people changed their minds and went with New York.

In any case, only one person said they would opt for another eight years of Bush. And it wasn’t because she necessarily likes him,  she just couldn’t bring herself to sacrafice so many people for just one man. What a noble position to take.

So, what do you think? Would you opt for eight more years of Bush or drop a bomb on a major US city?